Julia Ashley
Team Lead · Analyst · Remote ViewerTeam Lead and Lead Analyst at Intuitive Forecasting. Julia is a Cognitive Explorer and Multidimensional Cartographer mapping the expanding edges of human potential.
We practice Operational Precognitive Remote Viewing (OPRV) — taking on any serious question our intuition says yes to. We'll tell you honestly if yours isn't a fit.
Past projects have included law enforcement · intelligence work · future-event foresight · engineering solutions · creative direction
Most of our work is confidential. The quotes below are shared with permission, with names and details withheld to protect client questions and contexts.
“This team's work seems to have prevented a very concerning potential future event.”— Anonymous client
“Helped us figure out which of two technologies would be most useful for us.”— Anonymous client
“Gave us new ideas about how to solve an old problem.”— Anonymous client
Analysis is excellent at a constrained class of predictable problems. Machine learning is better still. But there's a whole category of questions where neither can help — and that's where we come in.
Questions with stable inputs and a traceable past: "If the temperature is X in location Y, what will energy usage be?" Analysis — classical or ML-assisted — is the right tool, and it's used every day in science, engineering, security, healthcare, law enforcement, and business.
Questions about genuinely novel, unpredictable, or hidden-information futures. We call these crystal-ball questions. For example:
Why this works. Precognition — the ability to perceive information about future events that cannot be predicted through ordinary means — has been tested in controlled studies and performs above chance across multiple labs and decades. It's a practiced skill, not a guess. See the research →
We use the Operational Precognitive Remote Viewing (OPRV) framework. You don't need to explain your project to the viewers — you don't even need to name it.
Tell us you're curious. We'll send a short questionnaire about your potential project. If it might be a fit, we'll schedule a consultation.
You can reveal your problem, concern, or goal — or describe it vaguely, whichever you prefer. Both methods work. We'll help you shape the query and give you a project estimate.
If both sides agree it's a fit, we move forward to scoping the project together. If either of us decides it isn't, we part friends — no charge for the conversation.
Our team uses the OPRV framework to access intuitive information about your question. Viewers don't consciously know anything about your area of interest while they work.
Our Team Lead, Julia Ashley, synthesizes the sessions, identifies commonalities, and writes a summary. You debrief with her directly.
Every project produces pages of notes and sketches. Raw viewer impressions get structured, cross-referenced, and synthesized into the summary you eventually read. A few redacted examples:
Scroll or swipe to see more →
Intuitive Forecasting works in support of Applied Love Labs — the 501(c)(3), founded by our own Julia Mossbridge, that builds science-informed tools and experiences around unconditional love. Their research underpins our practice. Project donations flow there. Applied Love Labs is a registered 501(c)(3) public charity · EIN 84-2570591.
We are an independent team of experienced, vetted, and scientifically informed remote viewers. We consider ourselves "positive precogs" — committed to OPRV because of its roots in unconditional love and its insistence on care.
Team Lead and Lead Analyst at Intuitive Forecasting. Julia is a Cognitive Explorer and Multidimensional Cartographer mapping the expanding edges of human potential.
Cognitive neuroscientist, author, and published precognition researcher. Founder and Chief Science Officer of Applied Love Labs. Brings rigor and warmth in equal measure.
applied.love ↗
OPRV practitioner with a background in non-local awareness. Works anonymously by choice.
Cybersecurity Executive and Educator.
jamesthomaswebb.com ↗
Empathic psychic, tarot reader, hula hooper, mass-scale participatory art creator, chaos magician, universal immigrant, and apparel designer.
aliceo.la ↗
Clairvoyant Medium, Space Domain Awareness SME, Geo-political Risk Analyst, Cognitive Security Enthusiast, Aspiring Inter-dimensional Interpreter.
Remote viewing has a 50+ year research record — declassified government work, peer-reviewed studies, and ongoing replication attempts. If you're coming to this fresh, start here.
An invited summary by our founder. Covers what the evidence actually shows, what it doesn't, and where the open questions are. Readable for non-specialists; honest about limitations. The best single entry point into the field.
Read on ResearchGate ↗Targ & Puthoff's SRI work, the declassified Stargate Program, IONS, Rhine, Bem and the replication literature. Curated with a "why this matters" line for each.
See all →If you're wondering something that isn't here, ask us directly — we'd rather answer it than have you guess.
Operational Precognitive Remote Viewing — a methodology developed by our founder Dr. Julia Mossbridge that combines precognitive remote viewing with the intentional sending of unconditional love to the target. Sessions are typically run before a question is even formulated, which keeps the target genuinely blind and the viewer's impressions independent of any present-moment expectation. Analysts link the recorded sessions to real-world questions afterward. OPRV is used to inspire new lines of inquiry — in intelligence work, scientific problem-solving, engineering, and personal growth — rather than as standalone evidentiary proof. In Mossbridge's published research, viewers reporting strong states of unconditional love achieve measurably higher accuracy.
Above chance, reliably — but never 100%. In controlled studies, remote viewing performs statistically above what you'd expect from guessing, across multiple labs and decades. In our applied work, we find it's most useful alongside analysis, not instead of it — as an additional lens on questions where the usual tools are running out of road. If we think your question is a bad fit, we'll tell you before you pay.
Happy to share a redacted example under NDA during your consultation. The session sketches above are representative of the raw material; the final product you receive is a written synthesis that weaves those impressions into a readable summary around your question.
If the consultation tells us the project isn't a fit — on our side or yours — there's no charge. If we do the work and the summary doesn't resonate with you, we'll talk. We don't guarantee truth (no one can), but we do guarantee care, effort, and honesty about what we found and didn't find.
Scientists, intelligence analysts, researchers, executives, founders, investigators, and policy advisors — leaders making consequential decisions under uncertainty. The common thread: the question is hard, the stakes are real, and conventional analysis has already been applied.
Yes. You can also choose not to share the specifics of your question with the viewers — the OPRV protocol works either way, because viewers work blind to the target. A mutual NDA is standard on any engagement.
Send us a brief note and we'll reply within a few days. No pressure, no commitment.
We'll read your note and reply within 3 business days. If your question sounds like a fit, we'll send a short questionnaire and set up a 30-minute consultation call. If it doesn't, we'll tell you honestly — and where possible, point you somewhere that will.